Honda D Series Forum banner

Progress II coilovers - but which spring rate for a potential B-swap.

762 Views 32 Replies 10 Participants Last post by  transzex
91 civic si hatcback manual, no Power steering, 14 inch wheels, stock swaybar front, CRX si swaybar rear.


Hello. I did a cursory search of the Progress II coilovers and b16 swaps, but I don't think I found any relevant hits.
I'm looking at buying a set of CS II coilovers, but not sure which spring rate to choose.
I'm torn between a daily or a square set up. This is why:

I don't daily the car, but still want it comfortable.
I don't ever plan on going past 15" wheels, so I doubt bending will be a huge concern - though fitment might.
I'm likely going to start a b16 swap within the next year, so I should be looking at the their heavier spring rates. However, I've already knocked off something to the tune of 50 lbs. on the nose, so the increased weight might be null? Especially if I get a full 100 lbs. off the front end? I don't know if that will actually be possible, but I sure as hell am going to try.
I would rather err on the side of understeer, but only barely. I'd like to make a mostly neutral setup. I know that tire/swaybar/weight will be better to fine tune, but I don't actually have the experience to do so yet. I'd like to pick an appropriate coilover setup, so I can play with the rest and learn.

Anyone have experience with my particular situation? What spring setup would you recommend?

Also, if anyone has any recommendations for something other than Progress, please feel free to share. I've already asked them this question. I haven't gotten a response yet. While I am patient and understand that businesses can't get back to questions immediately, I've also seen in the search that some people have waited months and still didn't get their stuff. While I get our cars are old and there aren't like 100 people buying from them each month, I wouldn't be too appreciative if I ordered them and didn't get them until sometime January.


TL;DR: Progress for b16 swap? Yay or nay? Or alternatives?
Thanks!
See less See more
1 - 20 of 33 Posts
600/550/500/450 LF/RF/LR/RR

But what year moosetang chassis you putting a B16 into?
  • Haha
Reactions: 2
Don't go square unless you are doing a daily. Normally you want a stiffer front vs rear.
My mistake. 91 si hatchback

First one is edited too.

600/550/500/450 LF/RF/LR/RR

But what year moosetang chassis you putting a B16 into?
I know you joke, but do people ever have different spring rates to account for the driver? Or is that ridiculous level?
I know you joke, but do people ever have different spring rates to account for the driver? Or is that ridiculous level?
That is what corner balancing is for.
I know you joke, but do people ever have different spring rates to account for the driver? Or is that ridiculous level?
Curious, as well!
Id prefer the rear spring rate to be slightly stiffer than the FRONT

For a good daily driver, your car will drive awesome with 200-250 up front and 250 or so in the rear.

Stock is somewhere around 100-150 up front, depending on if it was a 2dr, 4dr, manual, auto, etc...


Stiffer is not always better. But if the coilovers you are thinking about are built specifically based on your spring rate choice. I would want you to ride around in someones car with certain springrates to see if you are in the ballpark.


*slo edit * wanna try again my guy?

"NOPE" nothing to see here slo <whistles>
See less See more
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: 2
I daily drove the CS2 with squared 350/350. Handling was great, ride was decent.
I currently have identical setup in my coupe but 450 rear.
IMO the extra handling isn’t worth the loss of comfort if it’s your daily. You won’t be disappointed with the CS2 and 350 on each corner
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Id prefer the rear spring rate to be slightly stiffer than the rear.
*slo edit * wanna try again my guy?
😅 Now I'm even more confused. How'd you pull off that setup on a civic? Lol.

I daily drove the CS2 with squared 350/350. Handling was great, ride was decent.
I currently have identical setup in my coupe but 450 rear.
When you say you have an identical set up, you mean you have a b16 swap?
No I mean I’ve had two different CS2 setups installed on two different cars (98 Civic sedan and 98 Civic coupe)
950 springs in the rear, .095" sway on full stiff. That is what was used on the 2017 STL winner IIRC.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
If it is to make any power and see any type of competition, 550 square on a CS2's work great on an EF hatch. I currently have 450 square on my CRX, and 550 square on the track EF hatch. I actually prefer the 550 setup even on the street. Buy them new and they will be valved properly to match the springs.
Geez
I had to remember now..
I had 450 front 350 rears on my old del sol, and it sucked ass to drive on the normal roads. skunk2 struts, megan coils I think. WAY back, I think 2007 or 2008
I have CS3's, D16 EJ6 hatch. 450F 350R ride is too soft for my liking. Something in the 800/600 range would be nice.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I have CS3's, D16 EJ6 hatch. 450F 350R ride is too soft for my liking. Something in the 800/600 range would be nice.
Too soft? Likely need some bushing replacements. Trailing arm and the rear compensator bushing of the front lowers make a world of difference!!
  • Like
Reactions: 1
B16 EF, easy answer is Whitener setup.


Note the USDM cars have the D's and B's mounted on the wrong side of the car, that plus the drivers weight is the reason Andy Hollis ran 50 lbs heavier on the left side. Even when he went to the K swap he kept them the same way IIRC. I'll ask him when he's in town and I'm building his transmission for next years OLOA


He used to have "notes" on Facebook, but no idea where FB is hiding them now.

Andy is also the tire tester for GRM. Also when ST class needed certain block measurements Andy's info aligned with mine.

Link to the Hollis notes, I know what I'll be reading tonight....

See less See more
  • Love
  • Helpful
Reactions: 2
Damn. Found some images of their suspension.


Ugh. I can't avoid facebook, can I?
Guess it's time to start masking everything I do while I read. Looks like there is a LOT of stuff there.
  • Haha
Reactions: 1
You never really explained the application this car will see, or I couldnt tell. It says you dont daily the car, but still want it to be comfortable. What is this mystery application? What types of things will this car see?

I only ask because I've learned a shit ton about spring rates over the last year, and honestly for our honda's, average vehicle speeds and vehicle sprung weight have the most to do with their selection.

Many of our suspension/driveshaft/braking components themselves (i.e. unsprung weight components) arent all that heavy from stock, and any mods we do in thia area with aftermarket parts typically remove unsprung weight, so for simplicity sake, we wont discuss unsprung weight.

Average vehicle speeds are very important in selecting a good spring rate for two important reasons:

1) increasing vehicle speed increases overall sprung weight due to downforce, even on a stock body.

2) increasing vehicle speed increases the rate/frequency at which changes/bumps/obstacles/weight transfer/etc will present themselves to your suspension components.


That last point means that when vehicle speed increases, we must have a higher spring rate to allow the suspension to react and push the wheel into the ground in the same way a lower vehicle speed and lower spring rate will, in order to maintain good control.

In your application, will the car ever see, or need to operate over 100mph for extended periods of time, have downforce adders (i.e. a wing, splitter, etc.), while also doing other repetitive maneuvers at that speed (i.e. cornering, braking)? If so, you'll want a higher spring rate to up the natural peak oscillation frequency that the spring can operate at.



This chart will help you understand what I mean. A lower spring rate has a lower natural peak oscillation frequency, compared to a higher spring rate.

Your typical street spring might operate at a max ability of 1hz, or one cycle per second. This means it can only deal with forces trying to compress and expand it at a rate of 1 time per second. Oscillations from the road surface or vehicle weight transfer entering the wheel/lower control arm then into the spring at a rate higher than 1 cycle per second, the spring will end up clashing with second order harmonics. Imagine two separate forces trying to enter the spring, one entered at the right time so the spring is busy dealing with that force, and another suddenly appears when the spring wasnt ready to take anything else. The spring could only deal with the one force, but not the other that also appeared, because the spring cannot accept or repel any more energy than it already has during that 1 cycle per second.

This is an oversimplification, but helps explain that spring operating frequency is tied to spring rate selection. And the frequency need of the spring is tied to the operating environment of the vehicle.

A higher spring rate, and the spring can do or handle more compression/expansion events per second, along with higher initial weights imposed on it.

Spring frequency is a very important trait to consider based on your application.

  • If you're tracking this car with downforce adders, you need higher spring rates.
  • If your front end is heavier than the rear, you need higher rates in the front compared to the rear.
  • If you have high rate springs compared to stock, you need shocks that are designed, valved and tuned to manage higher spring rate oscillating frequencies.

For my EG, KTuned offered their K1 Street setup with 10k/600lb fronts and 6k/350lb rears. With the damper adjusters set to about half way, this setup rode amazing on the street, and did very well in corners until vehicle speeds exceeded 100mph.

I've since gone to 14k/800lb front and 10k/600lb rears, 100tw tires, gone B series and added a rear wing. Still on the same KTuned K1 shocks set to half way, its absolutely phenomenal how well the car handles now at 120+mph. The driver mod behind the wheel now needs to adapt to it with more seat time.

Hope this offers a decent starting point.
See less See more
  • Like
  • Love
  • Helpful
Reactions: 5
^ That right there, nails the coffin shut.
Were you ever a member on Team-integra.net ?
Some of your write-ups/explanations are eerily similar to a user over there named Michael Delaney. He wrote technical articles, in a way that every user (with half a functioning brain), could interpret. Very strong take-aways, much like your posts.
Well done.

Consider your ass kissed, back on topic lol:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4
Hope this offers a decent starting point.
What a great response. This just confirms what I’ve been feeling on the road from my car. The spring oscillation threshold specifically. Some of the city driving I do on shitty roads you can feel the suspension working but at high speed cornering with minor bumps you can feel how slow and sluggish the springs feel. Though some of that could probably be attributed to improperly tuned dampening.
1 - 20 of 33 Posts
Top