Joined
·
92 Posts
According to most of the big name tuners, running much over 12:1 on a street engine has diminishing returns. You have to pull so much timing to run pump gas that you'd make the same power with lower compression.
I prefer to stay with Honda engine builders and tuners. It amazing who you can talk to on Honda-Tech.screw the tuners, talk to the engine builders..........
Have you read who won the lastest Engine Masters build-off?????
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/enginemasters/challenge/2006/0610em_challenge_results_friday/
Wanna guess who's been helping me?????
Next week Tony's moving his shop to St. Leon, IN......needed more room.
Yeah, Don Flores, JDogg from Rocket Motorsports, Chris Whitfield from Rage Racing, Earl Laskey (R.I.P.), ect. are just random dudes on the internet without any practical experience. Those guys sucks.So do you think there is nothing to learn from a v8? Why exactly is their bigger air pump different than your smaller air pump? I would tend to believe people that build pro stock motors (the pinnacle of naturally aspirated) over some guys on ht.
I don't remember saying anywhere that it wasn't safe. I said you'd make the same power with lower compression because you wouldn't have to pull as much timing. And since I think your next statement was total bullshit, you should try understanding what you read before you mouth off.So why again is the magical number 12:1. What happens at 12.5:1 that was so different? What if I build my a6 to 11.9:1? Am I safe to run on pump gas?
Reading comprehension, the ability to understand what you read.In the world of internet forums, there are those that do and those that listen to people that haven't done.
I heard the same thing about stock fuel lines in a foxbody cannot support more than 450rwhp. I saw them support 800rwhp on a twin t3/t4 352" windsor. I heard that the stock TFI distributor cannot run past 7000 or support 600fwhp. I saw a car make over 900 to the tires (On 93 octane!) with a 363 and a precision 88mm turbo and a FAST xfi. Just recently someone told me that ported stock mustang heads (E7TE) cannot flow enough to make power past 4600 rpm, regardless of what was done to them. I built a very budget 347 that made 300rwhp from 4700 to 5800 and 360rwtq off idle with only $2800.
The point is this: if it is within reason, and is mathematically sound, then why does someone's brother's cousin say it cannot be done?
You need to read this site. http://www.literacy.uconn.edu/compre.htm. It'll improve your reading comprehension skills so you can actually understand what I'm saying instead of reading what you want to see.And transzex and I haven't? Further more, the people on here WITH ACTUAL REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE have posted their ideas and you ignore them because the gods that be on honda-tech have said its improbable.
I was under the impression that this was about general engine theory and not about one specific engine. I'm sorry, I wasn't born with this information and I've had to learn from professionals with decades of experience.Here you go again with your blanket statements. I am convinced this is your main problem. You regurgitate other people's comments out of context and then apply them to any situation. Do you even know how to calculate VE?
A Honda that sees over 100% VE isn't even hard to do if you know how to do it. Don't forget that these aren't two valve per cylinder V8s, they're four valve per cylinder Hondas. I'm not a professional head porter so no I haven't ported a head that well yet. The best I've gotten is 99%. Here you go making blanket assumptions.Do you honestly think there are many n/a engines on the street that even approach 95%. Even on honda-tech? An n/a motor that sees 100% VE is one very well built motor. Have you built one?
Ok, here's your grain of salt. You're a hypocrite since you posted again, too.but see your proving my point BY REPLYING!!!!!! your keeping the nonsense going...I'm done