Joined
·
78 Posts
Well first... we'll compare the three engines:
B16A - D16Y8 - D15B7
B16A
D16Y8
D15B7
((My Conclusion))
The B16A is the better engine straight from the factory, It got a very high Rod/Stroke ratio, which is hard to come by with even today's 4-cyl factory engines... It's advanteges over the 2 d's are the R/S ratio, larger bore, kinda ported head from factory with 33 mm intake valve size, and a higher CR... but wait a minute... that's it??? a D15B7 block with D16Z6 head and a D16Y8 head gasket and some exhaust bolt-on's(tuned), will increase the compression ratio up to the 10.1:1+ range, close to the B16A cr, and this setup puts out 120+ at the wheels... now there's at least a 15 whp diffrence between the B16A and the D16... now let's look at the left advanteges of the B16 over the D besides the CR... The Rod/Stroke ratio... B16's very high Rod/Stroke certanley help it reach very high RPM's and keep the piston velocity low, but when you think about it does it really matter? comparing a B16 to a B18, they both have the same bore and they both use the same rod, but the diffrence is in the crankshaft, the B18 87mm stroke gives it a low 1.58 Rod/Stroke ratio and it still produces more torque and hp... exactley 10 hp more, can we say a 10 mm stroke would be more benifitial to an engine then a long r/s ratio?, then again the R/S ratio is connected by how good the low-lift flow of the head is... but anyway, tell me your opinion and thouts about this suject/comparsion?
B16A - D16Y8 - D15B7
B16A
- Displacment: 1587.12cc
- Bore: 81 mm
- Stroke: 77 mm
- Compression Ratio: 10.2:1
- Intake Valve Size: 33 mm
- Rod/Stroke Ratio: 1.74
- WHP @ Peek: 135 hp @ 7800,
- WTQ @ Peek: 92 ft-lb @ 7300
D16Y8
- Displacment: 1590.43cc
- Bore: 75 mm
- Stroke: 90 mm
- Compression Ratio: 9.6:1
- Intake Valve Size: 30 mm
- Rod/Stroke Ratio: 1.52
- WHP @ Peek: 100 hp @ 6600,
- WTQ @ Peek: 84 ft-lb @ 5500
D15B7
- Displacment: 1493.23cc
- Bore: 75 mm
- Stroke: 84.5 mm
- Compression Ratio: 9.2:1
- Intake Valve Size: 29 mm
- Rod/Stroke Ratio: 1.59
- WHP @ Peek: ~85 hp @ 5900
- WTQ @ Peek: ~77 ft-lb @ 5000
((My Conclusion))
The B16A is the better engine straight from the factory, It got a very high Rod/Stroke ratio, which is hard to come by with even today's 4-cyl factory engines... It's advanteges over the 2 d's are the R/S ratio, larger bore, kinda ported head from factory with 33 mm intake valve size, and a higher CR... but wait a minute... that's it??? a D15B7 block with D16Z6 head and a D16Y8 head gasket and some exhaust bolt-on's(tuned), will increase the compression ratio up to the 10.1:1+ range, close to the B16A cr, and this setup puts out 120+ at the wheels... now there's at least a 15 whp diffrence between the B16A and the D16... now let's look at the left advanteges of the B16 over the D besides the CR... The Rod/Stroke ratio... B16's very high Rod/Stroke certanley help it reach very high RPM's and keep the piston velocity low, but when you think about it does it really matter? comparing a B16 to a B18, they both have the same bore and they both use the same rod, but the diffrence is in the crankshaft, the B18 87mm stroke gives it a low 1.58 Rod/Stroke ratio and it still produces more torque and hp... exactley 10 hp more, can we say a 10 mm stroke would be more benifitial to an engine then a long r/s ratio?, then again the R/S ratio is connected by how good the low-lift flow of the head is... but anyway, tell me your opinion and thouts about this suject/comparsion?